Passing or failing the test doesn't say anything about a film's quality, but it's a simple way any audience member can decide just how much LGBT people matter to a story. As simple as those criteria are, only six films out of the 101 major Hollywood releases GLAAD tracked in 2012 managed to pass the Russo Test, and in some of those six films these characters were only onscreen for a matter of minutes. Named after celebrated film historian and GLAAD co-founder Vito Russo, this test is something we hope more screenwriters and filmmakers keep in mind going forward. Meaning they are not there to simply provide colorful commentary, paint urban authenticity, or (perhaps most commonly) set up a punch line the character should matter. The LGBT character must be tied into the plot in such a way that their removal would have a significant effect. the character is made up of the same sort of unique character traits commonly used to differentiate straight characters from one another).ģ. That character must not be solely or predominantly defined by their sexual orientation or gender identity (i.e. The film contains a character that is identifiably lesbian, gay, bisexual, and/or transgender (LGBT).Ģ. That's why GLAAD, following the example of the Bechdel Test, developed a set of criteria anyone can use to determine where and how well LGBT characters are included. But nearly every film on the list began its life far outside the Hollywood studio system, which confirms just how important independent LGBT cinema has been in providing our community with stories and characters we could relate to.īut when it comes to being included in the grand cinematic universes created by Hollywood which are loved by millions worldwide, LGBT characters are typically left out of the picture. Many characters just barely missed the cut, including Jamie from Beautiful Thing, Bernadette from Priscilla, Queen of the Desert, and Celie Johnson from The Color Purple. That is a great selection of characters and films, and it was a close race all around. Here is who you picked as your top ten LGBT film characters. The hundreds of replies we received contained a wide and diverse range of answers which demonstrated two very important points: (a) these film characters make a profound and lasting impact on us, and (b) almost none of them come from movies made by the major Hollywood studios. With such a rich world of unique and cool characters, surely there's a place where you fit in, a character that is much like you are.With the release of GLAAD's first Studio Responsibility Index last week, we asked you to tell us who your all-time favorite LGBT film characters were. They're so engaging, they get their own movies without Batman even being present, and that's not something you can say about Lex Luthor or the Green Goblin. Batman's villains are the kind you never forget. Part of what makes Batman so iconic is his world and, in particular, his Rogue's Gallery. It's not the face behind the mask that people love that's for sure. No other solo character has had as many appearances on film as Batman, and no other character is still as interesting and engaging to audiences, even though the actor who plays him changes continuously. You might be pared up with Simon, Clary, Alec, Jace, Isabelle,Jordan, or. If you'd like to know, take the quiz and find out the results It'll only take a few mintutes to find your match. Do you want to find out who your Mortal Instruments match is I've always wondered who I'd be pared up with. Batman has been going strong for 80 years now and is the cornerstone of the entire DC comics universe. Who is your Mortal Instruments match 6 Comments. It was a fresh concept, and people loved it. Batman was a hero who looked like a bad guy he used fear as a tool. He was dark and intimidating, and he fought bad guys but in a way that was so different than a hero like Superman. "Detective Comics #27" came out in 1939 and introduced the world to a mysterious character named Batman.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |